Nuke or air strike

[Love]

Unnecessary.

 

[yungtitan]

Either or...

 

[Roger117]

The wouldn't fit into the game properly. All the maps are way too small.

 

[Layzie]

Would kill the game. Not large enough scale like CoD4 for the airstrikes, and def. not large enough for nuclear strikes.

 

[chrisjon]

with a biger maps and more ppl the air strikes would be cool but not any nukes

 

[Stingray88]

Airstrikes were lame in COD4 and would be even more lame in CA, so unnecessary.

 

[Roger117]

Airstrikes were lame in COD4 and would be even more lame in CA, so unnecessary.

This maps on CA are way too small to even have vehicles, so I wouldn't hope of nukes and airstrikes coming anytime soon.

 

[SplitNicholas]

they all suck

 

[CRussian]

Unnecessary only with bigger maps maybe

 

[RunFatBoyRun]

they should create a like huge map
and then the air strike should be a purchasable wep like used once per round available to commanding officers or something

 

[Gunluis57]

Would kill the game. Not large enough scale like CoD4 for the airstrikes, and def. not large enough for nuclear strikes.

I agree, if u input nuke strikes it would totally screw it up. Maybe for some maps airstrikes would be fine, but not nukes. Their radius of impact is like .... Big

 

[heamonculus]

way cheap cause the maps are to small

 

[Love]

I agree, if u input nuke strikes it would totally screw it up. Maybe for some maps airstrikes would be fine, but not nukes. Their radius of impact is like .... Big

Agreed, and decrease the explosion of the airstrikes.

 

[-DeaFen0-]

Disregarding any of the other posts, Airstrike all the way. I want to bomb the map efficiently and accurately like in CoD4 *cough* in my F-15C *cough*. A nuke would easily blow up the entire map and 3x the maps size around it! However, it would be an excellent kamikaze tactic...

 

[Gunluis57]

yes but, if you air strike a map that is too small it might cause the whole room to go down. >.>