Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
Anything & Everything
Off Topic Chat
31,949 and counting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BillyTheKid" data-source="post: 168882" data-attributes="member: 7959"><p>thats fucked up.</p><p>but either way were screwed. the way i look at it these are the options (both suck)</p><p>1. Troops are pulled out immediatley as a few years pass the strength of Iraws new central government will begin detererate and a slow and steady pace, the government is replaced by a dictatorship (terrorists dictatators etc..) and they use the figures dirty posted to recruit more soldiers. </p><p>2. We stay as long as necesary to help Iraq stabilize its newly found Government. But as time passes the people of the USA begin to wonder more and more WTF ARE DOING THERE, and the awnser well i dont think there is a logical one yet. The People begin to distrust the government more and more, and also if we stay numerous lives and great thinkers are wasted wether they be US soldiers or Iraqi civilians.</p><p></p><p>Either way were fucked at this point, in short we have started a holy war that will probably not stop until we leave and even then we cannot stop them from attacking Us soil. </p><p></p><p>Bush obvoiusly did not pay attention to the actions of his father who did not go after saddam and invade bagdhad because he saw no acceptable exit strategy were as his dumbass son bush pulled a rambo on us</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BillyTheKid, post: 168882, member: 7959"] thats fucked up. but either way were screwed. the way i look at it these are the options (both suck) 1. Troops are pulled out immediatley as a few years pass the strength of Iraws new central government will begin detererate and a slow and steady pace, the government is replaced by a dictatorship (terrorists dictatators etc..) and they use the figures dirty posted to recruit more soldiers. 2. We stay as long as necesary to help Iraq stabilize its newly found Government. But as time passes the people of the USA begin to wonder more and more WTF ARE DOING THERE, and the awnser well i dont think there is a logical one yet. The People begin to distrust the government more and more, and also if we stay numerous lives and great thinkers are wasted wether they be US soldiers or Iraqi civilians. Either way were fucked at this point, in short we have started a holy war that will probably not stop until we leave and even then we cannot stop them from attacking Us soil. Bush obvoiusly did not pay attention to the actions of his father who did not go after saddam and invade bagdhad because he saw no acceptable exit strategy were as his dumbass son bush pulled a rambo on us [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Anything & Everything
Off Topic Chat
31,949 and counting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top