Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Combat Arms
Mounted horses?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="-DeaFen0-" data-source="post: 79553" data-attributes="member: 3312"><p>You and I both know the idea is totally stupid. Here's why:</p><p> Quick way of getting around?</p><p>-That's what the portability stat and sprinting is for.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p> Quick and safe way of moving if horse is armored?</p><p>-I could kill a horse with two bullets from a K7, armored or not. Not only that, but your still totally exposed.</p><p></p><p> Mounting Weapons on a Horse would make it a small tank.</p><p>-I laughed at the idea of mounting weapons. That is one of the most unrealistic and idiotic ideas for any shooter I have ever seen. The horse itself wouldn't be able to mount any weapons on itself, as the back is where your sitting and the only viable spot. Not only that, but your shooting platform would be too unstable. Try shooting anything and being able to get a hit without luck. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>The only reason you would EVER, and I mean EVER put a horse in a shooter is in the era before World War I, perhaps even earlier. Heck, I'd rather be caught in a balloon overhead trying to get a shot a mile in the air than on a horse.</p><p></p><p>Now, in retaliation to your ideas, HOW DARE YOU EVER AGREE TO SUCH BABBLE!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="-DeaFen0-, post: 79553, member: 3312"] You and I both know the idea is totally stupid. Here's why: Quick way of getting around? -That's what the portability stat and sprinting is for.:eek: Quick and safe way of moving if horse is armored? -I could kill a horse with two bullets from a K7, armored or not. Not only that, but your still totally exposed. Mounting Weapons on a Horse would make it a small tank. -I laughed at the idea of mounting weapons. That is one of the most unrealistic and idiotic ideas for any shooter I have ever seen. The horse itself wouldn't be able to mount any weapons on itself, as the back is where your sitting and the only viable spot. Not only that, but your shooting platform would be too unstable. Try shooting anything and being able to get a hit without luck. :p The only reason you would EVER, and I mean EVER put a horse in a shooter is in the era before World War I, perhaps even earlier. Heck, I'd rather be caught in a balloon overhead trying to get a shot a mile in the air than on a horse. Now, in retaliation to your ideas, HOW DARE YOU EVER AGREE TO SUCH BABBLE!:D [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Combat Arms
Mounted horses?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top