Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Battlefield Heroes Forum
My impressions on BF2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoneyShot" data-source="post: 140349" data-attributes="member: 7628"><p>Well I like the game but I have a feeling that orginazation is going to be tough. There are no in game friends setups.</p><p></p><p>The weapons are balanced. It feels compared to counterstrike about the same speed, both faster and slower. You can get points for plenty of things, so the scoring is balanced. Commander is for the most part strategy/tactics, which has its own entertainment, and is equally rewarding.</p><p></p><p>Ranked servers allow advancement. This is what I at first considered unfair, but in about 15 hours of playing recieved one of the gun upgrades. Its a tradeoff so there is no advantage, it allows the player to change tactics and be effective. Since the average CS player is counterstriking 15 hours a week it should be a quick thing for the average player to get a benny.</p><p></p><p>The maps are expansive, there are multiple bottlenecks and tactical areas, its easy to get lost. Traversing a 64 player map takes 10 minutes by foot hustling, half the round if the player is moving at a cautious pace.</p><p></p><p>The vehicles are fun, and there is enough a balance that allows for vehicles to mix with personell, and with mounted positional defenses, a properly loaded out squad can defend a position.</p><p></p><p>Teamwork is a partial success, people join up teams or go solo, there is a varied ammount of general teamwork and always disorginization. The team the most organized wins.</p><p></p><p>Overall more simulation than counterstrike, the screen candy is on par with source, and the bullet flights are more realistic, where it takes time to travel and a certain ammount of bullet drop. Grenades dont kill on proximity, and objects offer much more varied cover.</p><p></p><p>I have not been much more than a passenger in aircraft, but they do add an element of suprise to the game. Armor is straightforward, they are not impenertrable by any means, and defensable against land and aircraft threats on different scales.</p><p></p><p>All in all well balanced, learning a map is much easier than counterstrike for the beginner, but rewarding for a specaialist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoneyShot, post: 140349, member: 7628"] Well I like the game but I have a feeling that orginazation is going to be tough. There are no in game friends setups. The weapons are balanced. It feels compared to counterstrike about the same speed, both faster and slower. You can get points for plenty of things, so the scoring is balanced. Commander is for the most part strategy/tactics, which has its own entertainment, and is equally rewarding. Ranked servers allow advancement. This is what I at first considered unfair, but in about 15 hours of playing recieved one of the gun upgrades. Its a tradeoff so there is no advantage, it allows the player to change tactics and be effective. Since the average CS player is counterstriking 15 hours a week it should be a quick thing for the average player to get a benny. The maps are expansive, there are multiple bottlenecks and tactical areas, its easy to get lost. Traversing a 64 player map takes 10 minutes by foot hustling, half the round if the player is moving at a cautious pace. The vehicles are fun, and there is enough a balance that allows for vehicles to mix with personell, and with mounted positional defenses, a properly loaded out squad can defend a position. Teamwork is a partial success, people join up teams or go solo, there is a varied ammount of general teamwork and always disorginization. The team the most organized wins. Overall more simulation than counterstrike, the screen candy is on par with source, and the bullet flights are more realistic, where it takes time to travel and a certain ammount of bullet drop. Grenades dont kill on proximity, and objects offer much more varied cover. I have not been much more than a passenger in aircraft, but they do add an element of suprise to the game. Armor is straightforward, they are not impenertrable by any means, and defensable against land and aircraft threats on different scales. All in all well balanced, learning a map is much easier than counterstrike for the beginner, but rewarding for a specaialist. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Battlefield Heroes Forum
My impressions on BF2
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top