I personally translated this from a Dutch site, so there are bound to be a number of mistakes in it, including one word which I am not familiar with. Especially the last paragraph is full with mistakes, but it should still be understandable.
<div align="center">---</div>
According to a research of the 27th of June, which was made in Canada, the more older brothers a man has, the higher the chance that the youngest of the brothers will eventually be homosexual. This is only the case when the biological brothers. There is no connection to step-brothers (as you often hear in someone being adopted in a family). The influence of older brother is biological and can not be explained by social factors.
<div align="center">
a part of the gay parade</div>
This is apparent out of research from the Canadian psycholical Anthony Bogaert, which appears this week in the PNAS Online Early Edition. A couple of years ago, Bogaert proved that as long as a man has an older brother, he would feel sexual attracted to other men (though barely a three percent in his research), with 38 percent increased. Sisters and younger brothers are of no concern. Back then, he kept the option open that growing up in a family with older brothers could lead to the fact that a boy could start feeling young and innoccent and a bit feminine. When searching for a partner, a younger brother could aim more for the manly type and eventually be attracted to men.
This new research, done by almost a thousand Canadian men now closes that option. Bogaert made a difference now between biological and non-biological brothers. Only the amount of biological brothers kept relating to the homosexuality; the number of older non-biological brothers didn't matter, and the same for younger brothers and sisters. The amount of time a man spends in his childhood with his older biological brother(s) in one home didn't matter either. Even if he didn't grow up with them at all, it would still increase the chance of homosexuality.
The explanation for this must prenatal. There are, according to Bogaert, indirect hints that the immunity-system of the mother, every time she gets pregnant of a boy it would react stronger to specific manly, and 'body-unknown' species. The womb would have influence on the brains of the unborn son and it would lose the ability to do that. This theory explains also why women with older sister are often not lesbians.
<div align="center">---</div>
My first reaction upon reading this was: "Excuse me?"
As most people here know, I have an older brother... and an older sister. My brother is seven years older than me and my sister is seven years older than my brother. The research does not say that I should be immediately homosexual, but should feel at least partly attracted to men... as most people know, I'm a guy as well. Seeing as some people actually mistaked me for not being one, I think it might be best if I clear that up as well.
I took a little time to think about it and tried to go through some stuff. I happen to have an older brother, but I don't seem to have any friends who are in a similar situations. All my friends either have no siblings, or only an older sister... well, except for one of them: Jeroen, but he's a twin, and we don't have much contact with each other anymore.
Therefore, I cannot compare my own interests to others I know personally.
<div align="center">
Number one radio DJ, Edwin Evers, the man I look up to the most.</div>
I am not attracted to men, (despite Edwin Evers being my idol, who is (clearly) a man) but have quite a feminene side most people are aware of as well. Something I do not mind at all, and actually am pretty fond of. In opposite of several years ago, I am very happy with my personality and how I am, despite messing a few things of dire importance up quite badly only recently.
With no influence over it, I fall for girls and only girls. But admitted, about three years ago, I could've sworn that the type of girls I'd fall for were tomboys. Truthfully that I didn't really know much about what types I'd fall for, and therefore dismissed it. As most also know, I went through quite some changes over the last two years and reached my 'final stop' about four months ago, thanks to a very kind girl who has proven to be one of the most returning people in my quote of the day or merely in a subject I am talking about.
In a quick calculation, I've had a crush for about two times and others were nothing more than lust. I am personally convinced that I can look back on them all, and point out what were crushes (or love) and lust. Despite me overly caring for one specific girl, it is not love. ("I love you, but I could never fall in love with you." - Me)
How about others? Would you say that this research could have the truth in it? I happen to be a good example of this, despite not really being homosexual.
<div align="center">---</div>
According to a research of the 27th of June, which was made in Canada, the more older brothers a man has, the higher the chance that the youngest of the brothers will eventually be homosexual. This is only the case when the biological brothers. There is no connection to step-brothers (as you often hear in someone being adopted in a family). The influence of older brother is biological and can not be explained by social factors.
<div align="center">
a part of the gay parade</div>
This is apparent out of research from the Canadian psycholical Anthony Bogaert, which appears this week in the PNAS Online Early Edition. A couple of years ago, Bogaert proved that as long as a man has an older brother, he would feel sexual attracted to other men (though barely a three percent in his research), with 38 percent increased. Sisters and younger brothers are of no concern. Back then, he kept the option open that growing up in a family with older brothers could lead to the fact that a boy could start feeling young and innoccent and a bit feminine. When searching for a partner, a younger brother could aim more for the manly type and eventually be attracted to men.
This new research, done by almost a thousand Canadian men now closes that option. Bogaert made a difference now between biological and non-biological brothers. Only the amount of biological brothers kept relating to the homosexuality; the number of older non-biological brothers didn't matter, and the same for younger brothers and sisters. The amount of time a man spends in his childhood with his older biological brother(s) in one home didn't matter either. Even if he didn't grow up with them at all, it would still increase the chance of homosexuality.
The explanation for this must prenatal. There are, according to Bogaert, indirect hints that the immunity-system of the mother, every time she gets pregnant of a boy it would react stronger to specific manly, and 'body-unknown' species. The womb would have influence on the brains of the unborn son and it would lose the ability to do that. This theory explains also why women with older sister are often not lesbians.
<div align="center">---</div>
My first reaction upon reading this was: "Excuse me?"
As most people here know, I have an older brother... and an older sister. My brother is seven years older than me and my sister is seven years older than my brother. The research does not say that I should be immediately homosexual, but should feel at least partly attracted to men... as most people know, I'm a guy as well. Seeing as some people actually mistaked me for not being one, I think it might be best if I clear that up as well.
I took a little time to think about it and tried to go through some stuff. I happen to have an older brother, but I don't seem to have any friends who are in a similar situations. All my friends either have no siblings, or only an older sister... well, except for one of them: Jeroen, but he's a twin, and we don't have much contact with each other anymore.
Therefore, I cannot compare my own interests to others I know personally.
<div align="center">
Number one radio DJ, Edwin Evers, the man I look up to the most.</div>
I am not attracted to men, (despite Edwin Evers being my idol, who is (clearly) a man) but have quite a feminene side most people are aware of as well. Something I do not mind at all, and actually am pretty fond of. In opposite of several years ago, I am very happy with my personality and how I am, despite messing a few things of dire importance up quite badly only recently.
With no influence over it, I fall for girls and only girls. But admitted, about three years ago, I could've sworn that the type of girls I'd fall for were tomboys. Truthfully that I didn't really know much about what types I'd fall for, and therefore dismissed it. As most also know, I went through quite some changes over the last two years and reached my 'final stop' about four months ago, thanks to a very kind girl who has proven to be one of the most returning people in my quote of the day or merely in a subject I am talking about.
In a quick calculation, I've had a crush for about two times and others were nothing more than lust. I am personally convinced that I can look back on them all, and point out what were crushes (or love) and lust. Despite me overly caring for one specific girl, it is not love. ("I love you, but I could never fall in love with you." - Me)
How about others? Would you say that this research could have the truth in it? I happen to be a good example of this, despite not really being homosexual.