Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
Anything & Everything
Entertainment & Digital
Movies & TV
Star Trek XI (Galaxy Quest)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="candle_TAW" data-source="post: 79833" data-attributes="member: 2597"><p>How do yall feel about the new movie from previews and photos of it. Am i the only one that looks at it and go WTF? I understand the need to draw a larger fan base, but they tried this before, anyone remember Star Trek Enterprise, the normal fan based boycotted it, and normal people didnt watch it. JJ Abrams is a fine director and visonary and if this story of his had say been done after the 24th century i wouldn't mind. But the Bridge of the NCC-1701 should not look more advanced than the bridge of the NCC-1701-E. Also they show a young Kirk watching the Enterprise be built, except the Enterprise was launched in 2245, Kirk took command in 2264 @ age 33, meaning he was 14, not the early 20's he appears to be. Also the Enterprise was not capable of sustained atmospheric flight, so explain to me why was she built in the desert? The Enterprise was built at San Fransico Fleet Yards, not Death Valley, also its in orbit (<a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_Francisco_Fleet_Yards" target="_blank">http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_Francisco_Fleet_Yards</a>). To many problems with the movie actully, JJ had no right to mess this up honestly, and it should never be introduced into the Cannon ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="candle_TAW, post: 79833, member: 2597"] How do yall feel about the new movie from previews and photos of it. Am i the only one that looks at it and go WTF? I understand the need to draw a larger fan base, but they tried this before, anyone remember Star Trek Enterprise, the normal fan based boycotted it, and normal people didnt watch it. JJ Abrams is a fine director and visonary and if this story of his had say been done after the 24th century i wouldn't mind. But the Bridge of the NCC-1701 should not look more advanced than the bridge of the NCC-1701-E. Also they show a young Kirk watching the Enterprise be built, except the Enterprise was launched in 2245, Kirk took command in 2264 @ age 33, meaning he was 14, not the early 20's he appears to be. Also the Enterprise was not capable of sustained atmospheric flight, so explain to me why was she built in the desert? The Enterprise was built at San Fransico Fleet Yards, not Death Valley, also its in orbit ([url]http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_Francisco_Fleet_Yards[/url]). To many problems with the movie actully, JJ had no right to mess this up honestly, and it should never be introduced into the Cannon ever. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Anything & Everything
Entertainment & Digital
Movies & TV
Star Trek XI (Galaxy Quest)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top