Ya, I kinda did a few very short tests with the SR25 no scoped at pretty short range standing still and dotted and it still sucked. I can imagine the L9 fares better, I've been no scoped by people with those quite a few times.
I'm not that stupid, it's got an invisble cross hair, but it still expands and all that crap. So spraying with the sr-25 will be inconsitant, because the cross hair on it has expanded.
When my G36E runs out, I'm planning to buy an L9 and have a no-scope experiment-match with one of my friends. See if a) Movement decreases no-scope accuracy b) No-scope worth using and c) how accurate out of 10 is no scope, really?
There is nothing noobish about no scoping. Using a gun meant for long range shots, with no reticle, as a shot gun is far from noobish lol. Plus, most people who no scope, quick scope as well.
A little thing I have recently found out, although it may just be in my head, the regular L96A1 is better at quick/no scoping than the Arctic Wolf. I've used them both right after eachother and the Arctic Wolf seems kinda slow compared to the regular one.
Has anyone noticed that sometimes with a sniper rilfe no scoped, trained on an enemy that you can see their names, just like with a gun that has a reticule that is visble.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.