Undead_Lives
New Member
Ehehe, I don't really play much strategy.... :yay:
-
Come and join our gamer community by registering for free here
Rate some games
- Thread starter Splatt
- Start date
Werbung:
Undead_Lives
New Member
Heroes of Might and Magic IV was a great game too. It is sorta like Warcraft, just not real time. You make units and such and move around the map in days, and then each player get's a turn. Also, you have to have "forts" to make units (there are different kind of forts to make different units), and you capture your enemy's fort to win. Great game.
You can even make custom maps on it, which I think is cool.
5/5.
You can even make custom maps on it, which I think is cool.
5/5.
rate these games in a scale of 1 to 10:
Heroes III (with all of its expansions) = 9/10
Heroes IV (with all of its expansions) = 7/10
Civilization 3 (with all of its expansions) = 9/10
Civilization 4 = 8/10
*PS: i didnt liked strategy games in the time civ2 was launched, in that time i liked to play Quake 1 and Heretic
Heroes III (with all of its expansions) = 9/10
Heroes IV (with all of its expansions) = 7/10
Civilization 3 (with all of its expansions) = 9/10
Civilization 4 = 8/10
*PS: i didnt liked strategy games in the time civ2 was launched, in that time i liked to play Quake 1 and Heretic
Undead_Lives
New Member
One of two strategy games I have EVER played.
What? Heroes IV was a great game! 9/10!
Undead_Lives
New Member
Hm, I never played 3. But I still thought 4 was awesome..
The campaigns are hard.
The campaigns are hard.
Black & White 2:
Story:
Well,there isn't much of a story in Black & White 2.
But then again,game like Black & White doesn't need to have a storyline.
-------------------------------6/10-------------------------------
Characters:
There are four monsters you can choose at the beggining:
Monkey(or ape,w/e that thing is)
Lion
Wolf
Cow(wtf!?)
Every one of them is different,so it gives an extra replay value,since you want to "pet" all of 'em.
-------------------------------8/10-------------------------------
Graphics:
One word
SWEET!
Too bad,my pc isn't so powerful >.<
-------------------------------10/10-------------------------------
Gameplay:
If you played first Black & White,then this is just an improved version of the original.
It's still focuses on you "petting" your monster,but his AL is greatly improved,and now beside your monster you have to take care of your people.
Who doesn't want a huge army and a huge monster?
-------------------------------10/10-------------------------------
Extras/Replay:
There is a great replay value,since you have 4 monster to pick,you can be good or evil,mini-games...
-------------------------------9/10-------------------------------
Overall:
-------------------------------9/10-------------------------------
Story:
Well,there isn't much of a story in Black & White 2.
But then again,game like Black & White doesn't need to have a storyline.
-------------------------------6/10-------------------------------
Characters:
There are four monsters you can choose at the beggining:
Monkey(or ape,w/e that thing is)
Lion
Wolf
Cow(wtf!?)
Every one of them is different,so it gives an extra replay value,since you want to "pet" all of 'em.
-------------------------------8/10-------------------------------
Graphics:
One word
SWEET!
Too bad,my pc isn't so powerful >.<
-------------------------------10/10-------------------------------
Gameplay:
If you played first Black & White,then this is just an improved version of the original.
It's still focuses on you "petting" your monster,but his AL is greatly improved,and now beside your monster you have to take care of your people.
Who doesn't want a huge army and a huge monster?
-------------------------------10/10-------------------------------
Extras/Replay:
There is a great replay value,since you have 4 monster to pick,you can be good or evil,mini-games...
-------------------------------9/10-------------------------------
Overall:
-------------------------------9/10-------------------------------
ragingspeedhorn
New Member
The best Civilization game was II, III and IV is "okay" but not as good as II... The first one totally sucked both in graphics and gameplay, I got it for the old Amiga computer...
No offense, but your name and the fact you dont seem to have . . . much . . . makes me have a slight suspicion about you that you are an Arab. Forgive me, if i am wrong, but it is just a thought I had. I dont mean to insult you, if you are not Arab, as that would be nasty if i did . . .
Aoe3 Is quite fun for the firest 10 days or so, but its editor is not as expansive as the wc3 one. Great strategy game, and it is not overbalanced such as wc3 mellee games are. The slightly unbalanced units such as heavy canon are really fun, and there is a decent system of counters, that means canon can be countered by cavalry, and such. But musketeers absoloutly SUCK vs canon, as do all infantry, and that really ruins the game a bit. I'd give it a 7/10 for graphics, 0/10 for humour 4/10 for continuous playability and overall, a 6/10
whereas wc3 would get 8/10 for graphics (they are pretty good for any game) 10/10 for humour (some custom games are extremely funny) Infinate/10 for continuous playability (their editor is simply a masterpeice and is pure brilliance) and overall a 11/10 . wc3 PWNS!!!!!
Werbung:
ragingspeedhorn
New Member
Raiju is from Mexico as far as I remember...
